ANALISIS PENGARUH FRAUD PENTAGON TERHADAP FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL STATEMENT

Nana Naraika Naminingsih, Andy Dwi Bayu Bawono, Erma Setiawati

Abstract


ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh elemen fraud pentagon terhadap fraudulent financial statement pada perusahaan manufaktur sektor industri barang konsumsi yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2017–2019. Elemen fraud pentagon dalam penelitian ini terdiri atas financial stability, financial target, nature of industry, effective monitoring, change in auditor, capability, dan arrogance. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari laporan tahunan dan laporan keuangan auditan perusahaan. Sampel ditentukan menggunakan metode purposive sampling berdasarkan kriteria tertentu, sehingga diperoleh 13 perusahaan dengan 32 observasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa financial stability berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap fraudulent financial statement. Sementara itu, financial target, nature of industry, effective monitoring, change in auditor, capability, dan arrogance tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap fraudulent financial statement. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa tekanan akibat perubahan stabilitas keuangan menjadi faktor utama yang dapat mendorong manajemen melakukan kecurangan laporan keuangan pada perusahaan sampel.

Kata kunci: Fraud pentagon, arrogance, capability, pressure, opportunity, rationalization

ABSTRACT

This study aims to analyze the effect of the fraud pentagon elements on fraudulent financial statements in consumer goods manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2017–2019 period. The fraud pentagon elements examined in this study consist of financial stability, financial target, nature of industry, effective monitoring, change in auditor, capability, and arrogance. This study employs a quantitative approach using secondary data obtained from companies’ annual reports and audited financial statements. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling method based on predetermined criteria, resulting in 13 companies with 39 observations. The data analysis technique used is multiple linear regression. The results show that financial stability has a positive and significant effect on fraudulent financial statements. Meanwhile, financial target, nature of industry, effective monitoring, change in auditor, capability, and arrogance do not have a significant effect on fraudulent financial statements. These findings indicate that pressure arising from changes in financial stability is the main factor that may encourage management to commit financial statement fraud in the sampled companies.

Keywords: Fraud pentagon, arrogance, capability, pressure, opportunity, rationalization.


Keywords


Fraud pentagon, arrogance, capability, pressure, opportunity, rationalization

References


Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2026). Occupational fraud 2026: A report to the nations. https://www.acfe.com/fraud-resources/report-to-the-nations

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2011). Fraud examination (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Annisya, M., Lindrianasari, & Asmaranti, Y. (2016). Pendeteksian kecurang laporan keuangan menggunakan fraud diamond. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 23(1), 72–89. https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fe3/article/view/4307

Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M. A., & Daat, S. C. (2018). Pengujian teori fraud pentagon terhadap fraudulent financial reporting: Studi empiris pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2011–2015. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Daerah, 13(1), 114–134. https://doi.org/10.52062/jakd.v13i1.1429

Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.

Beasley, M. S., & Salterio, S. E. (2001). The relationship between board characteristics and voluntary improvements in audit committee composition and experience. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(4), 539–570. https://doi.org/10.1506/RM1J-A0YM-3VMV-TAMV

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.

Crowe Horwath. (2011). Putting the Freud in fraud: Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough. Crowe Horwath LLP.

Hamadi, Y. V., Stephanus, D. S., & Wijayanti, D. (2022). Fraud pentagon theory: Alat deteksi financial statement fraud pada perusahaan property dan real estate di Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapura. El Muhasaba: Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.18860/em.v13i2.14305

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Lou, Y.-I., & Wang, M.-L. (2009). Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 7(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v7i2.2262

Nizarudin, A., Nugroho, A. A., & Agustina, D. (2023). Comparative analysis of Crowe’s fraud pentagon theory on fraudul ent financial reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, 27(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v27i1.1104

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2014). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 33/POJK.04/2014 tentang Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris Emiten atau Perusahaan Publik.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2015 tentang Praktik Akuntan Publik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2015 Nomor 79. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/5584/pp-no-20-tahun-2015

Rahayuningsih, B., & Sukirman. (2021). Determinan fraudulent financial statement dalam perspektif fraud pentagon theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 19(2), 162–182. https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v19i2.3586

Rezianti, M. A., Astuti, S. W., & Wicaksono, A. P. N. (2022). Pengaruh fraud pentagon terhadap fraudulent financial reporting. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 10(3), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v10i3.43463

Setiawati, E., & Baningrum, R. M. (2018). Deteksi fraudulent financial reporting menggunakan analisis fraud pentagon: Studi kasus pada perusahaan manufaktur yang listed di BEI tahun 2014–2016. Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v3i2.6645

Siddiq, F. R., & Suseno, A. E. (2019). Fraud pentagon theory dalam financial statement fraud pada perusahaan terdaftar di Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) periode 2014–2017: Perspektif F-Score model. Jurnal Nusantara Aplikasi Manajemen Bisnis, 4(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.29407/nusamba.v4i2.13800

Sihombing, K. S., & Rahardjo, S. N. (2014). Analisis fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud: Studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2010–2012. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3(2), 657–668. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/6136

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. In M. Hirschey, K. John, & A. K. Makhija (Eds.), Corporate governance and firm performance (Advances in Financial Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 53–81). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005

Summers, S. L., & Sweeney, J. T. (1998). Fraudulently misstated financial statements and insider trading: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review, 73(1), 131–146. https://www.jstor.org/stable/248345

Tessa, C. G., & Harto, P. (2016). Fraudulent financial reporting: Pengujian teori fraud pentagon pada sektor keuangan dan perbankan di Indonesia. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX, 1–21.

Tiffani, L., & Marfuah. (2015). Deteksi financial statement fraud dengan analisis fraud triangle pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol19.iss2.art3

Wells, J. T. (2017). Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection (5th ed.). Wiley.

Widarjono, A. (2015). Analisis multivariat terapan dengan program SPSS, AMOS, dan SMARTPLS (2nd ed.). UPP STIM YKPN.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs/1537/

Yesiariani, M., & Rahayu, I. (2017). Deteksi financial statement fraud: Pengujian dengan fraud diamond. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 21(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol21.iss1.art5




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35906/jurakun.v12i2.2679

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 273 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) - 106 times

Copyright (c) 2026 Nana Naraika Naminingsih, Andy Dwi Bayu Bawono, Erma Setiawati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Author Owns the Copyright of The Article Published in Jurnal Akuntansi STIE Muhammadiyah Palopo

Article Jurnal akuntansi STIE Muhammadiyah Palopo been through a peer review process prior to publication. Journals, editors and editorial boards have the right or obligation to retract articles that contain inaccurate and misleading data if any. Read the Plagiarism Policy and Publication Ethics. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License Creative Commons License.

Website Layout and Editing © 2016 Jurnal Akuntansi STIE Muhammadiyah Palopo on Lembaga Penerbitan dan Publikasi Ilmiah (LPPI) Universitas Muhammadiyah Palopo.